GRO Foods plc
The GRO Foods plc example was created by a team from PricewaterhouseCoopers comprising finance, retail, sustainability and climate change specialists. The example was also subject to industry consultation, which included a round-table discussion attended by Finance Directors and other representatives from a number of major supermarket groups and the investment sector, as well as industry experts.
The aim of this example is to demonstrate the strategic relevance not only of a supermarket group's direct impacts, such as energy use and waste, but also the more indirect impacts, such as the use of finite natural resources in the supply chain, interaction with employees and local communities, and end-user consumption, where the majority of sustainability impacts in this industry are found.
"Sustainability issues, such as those contained in this example, are fundamental to our strategy as our customers are demanding that we address these areas. This creates value drivers that should be presented as part and parcel of the Annual Report and Accounts. Moving forward, there is a need for sector comparability, built on information that is used to manage the business, much of which is already collected."
Darren Shapland, Chief Financial Officer
J Sainsbury plc
About GRO Foods
GRO Foods is a UK listed supermarket selling a wide range of food and non-food products from stores in six countries. The main markets are in Europe (60%) and the USA (25%). In recent years much of our sales growth has come from the emerging Asian economies of India and China, which now account for 15% of total sales. The Group owns 700 stores and employs 150,000 people globally.
Our vision
The Group's vision is to be the leading supermarket in the provision of responsibly sourced, quality food and non-food products.
The impact of sustainability issues on our key strategic objectives
The following section describes how sustainability issues impact on the achievement of our four key business objectives. The purpose of our Connected Performance Report (found in our Operating and Financial Review) is to report on the performance of specific actions taken to address the sustainability issues described and how these can contribute to the achievement of our overall strategic objectives.
Our Key Performance Indicators
The table below outlines our KPIs for each of our four strategic objectives
1. Sales growth
Strategy
This objective will be achieved by improving the shopping experience, expanding the number of retail outlets, particularly in high growth areas, and continually innovating to deliver great value products that meet the needs of our customers.
Sustainability context
Expanding our retail network increases the impact we have on the environment, mainly through increased carbon emissions and use of water in both our direct and indirect operations. It also increases the importance of rising concerns regarding health issues such as obesity and diabetes.
Risk and opportunities
We have amended our store development model to build only 'eco-stores', which use at least 70% less energy than standard stores, and as a result are experiencing a 22% improvement in the level of planning permission granted. We are also focusing on mitigating environmental threats to our stores to enhance the value of our property stock.
Governments are legislating to reduce the salt and sugar content of food products and we face risks if we are not well placed to meet changing requirements. We are therefore developing our own-brand food lines to ensure they meet both the appropriate legislation and the consumer demand for great tasting, affordable food that meets a growing desire for more balanced diets.
Staying ahead of legislation and communicating the nutritional benefits of our products has resulted in an increase in the number of weekly customer visits from 18 to 18.5 million. The UK's Food Standards Authority (FSA) is at the forefront of science in this area and we are applying UK guidelines across our operations worldwide.
In order to achieve sales growth we will increase floor space over the next five years and ensure that both new and existing stores are 'eco-efficient' and mitigated against the physical and regulatory risks of climate change. We will continue to invest in new product innovation, providing healthy, quality foods that our customers expect from us. We will meet the increasing demands of our customers for healthy food products by reducing the salt and sugar content of our own-brand products, following the recommended targets set by the UK's Food Standards Agency.
New stores
Target
- Open 160 new stores from 2007 to 2014; 100 will be in Europe and 60 will be in India and China.
- All new stores will be 'eco-stores' that require 70% less energy compared to standard stores.
Performance
| Investment in growth |
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 (Actual) |
2009 (Actual) |
2010–2014 (Target) |
| Number of new stores opened |
10 |
20 |
20 |
110 |
| Total premium to build eco stores (£ million) |
95 |
190 |
190 |
1,045 |
| Total lifetime savings in energy costs over a 25 year lifespan (£ million) |
79 |
146 |
142 |
718 |
Comments
During 2009, GRO obtained planning permission for 45
new stores in Europe and five stores in India and China.
Compared with standard stores, environmental stores
have a higher planning application acceptance rate,
an improvement of 22% in our European markets.
Significant additional investment is required to build our
new 'eco-stores', but these require 70% less energy than
standard stores and will reduce emissions by this amount
as well. More efficient refrigeration, lighting, heating and
ventilation systems in these new stores will significantly help
to achieve these energy savings.
New product innovation
Target
- Increase sales of our healthy 'Balanced' food range by £200 million by 2014.
- Reduce salt and sugar content in our main product lines (bread, cereal, frozen convenience and ready meals) to meet and exceed the FSA's recommended limits.
Performance
Click here to see performance
Comments
Sales of our 'Balanced' range reached £200 million in 2009.
We invested £8 million in research and development to
reduce the salt and sugar content of the four main product
lines. We will not meet the FSA's proposed targets for salt
content in bread and cereals by 2010, but are on track to
meet these targets by 2015. Reductions in the salt content
of frozen convenience and ready meal products will not meet
the 2010 targets either, but our research shows that our salt
and sugar contents of these products are lower than that of
our competitors, and we are targeting significant reductions
by 2015.
We have seen an increase in the number of weekly customer
visits from 18 million per week to 18.5 million since 2008.
A survey conducted in 2009 indicates that approximately
50% of this increase is attributable to our new, healthier
product ranges, associated advertising and other customer
engagement activities to promote healthy living.
2.Improving operational efficiency and delivering cost savings
Strategy
We look to deliver ever greater value to our customers and improve returns to our shareholders by enhancing efficiency and lowering costs. To mitigate the impacts on our business of volatile and increasing energy costs and emerging carbon and waste reduction legislation, we are focusing on reducing our energy use and minimising waste.
Sustainability context
As a retailer, we use significant amounts of energy, which in 2009 cost £40 million and equated to carbon emissions of 360,000 tonnes. While we could buy more 'green energy', we feel it is more prudent to seek to reduce our energy consumption and invest in our own renewable energy capacity. We are also reducing emissions from our transport by more efficient loading and the introduction of electric vehicles.
Waste is another impact with which the retail sector is increasingly associated, whether from packaging, food waste generated directly by our own stores, or indirectly by our suppliers and customers. This year we created packaging waste of 650,000 tonnes, construction waste from new stores of 450,000 tonnes and sent 35,000 tonnes of waste to landfill. We have committed to halve the weight of packaging of our products, reduce our new build construction waste by 50% and divert all food waste from landfill to energy generation and composting by 2014.
Risk and opportunities
Medium-term, energy price volatility poses the greatest threat to our cost base. More immediately, legislation such as the UK's Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) will take approximately £5 million from our 2011 cash flow, while UK landfill tax is set to double by 2013. When similar legislation is imposed across all our markets, as anticipated, the risk will be multiplied many times over.
We will reduce our environmental impact and achieve cost savings by reducing the amount of energy used. The cumulative benefits of our waste reduction programmes have resulted in £10 million in cost savings in 2009.
One of our biggest costs is energy use, which accounts for approximately 15% of total operating costs (approximately 5% stores and 10% transport) and we are developing energy efficiency programmes which will allow us to increase sales while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and help us meet the required legislation. Waste is also a significant cost as a result of landfill and associated transportation costs and we also have a specific waste reduction programme in place to reduce these costs.
Reduce total energy use
Target
-
Increase investment in renewable energy so that 40%
of all energy needs will be generated from such sources
by 2014.
-
Reduce CO2 emissions by 120,000 tonnes (18%)
by 2014 against a 2007 baseline.
- Reduce our CO2 emissions per square metre by 44%
by 2014 against a 2007 baseline for existing stores.
-
Reduce road miles travelled per pallet of stock
by 10% by 2014.
Performance
|
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 (Projected) |
2014 (Target) |
| Annual energy cost (£ million) |
45 |
43 |
40 |
38 |
35 |
|
GRO – kg CO2e /m2 of floor space
|
320 |
320 |
300 |
290 |
180 |
| Renewable energy generated on-site (% of total) |
18 |
18 |
25 |
30 |
40 |
| Investment in on-site energy generation (£ million) |
8 |
8.5 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
| Investment in energy efficiency measures (£ million) |
20 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
|
Annual savings1 (£ million)
|
9 |
9.5 |
10 |
10.5 |
15 |
| Average payback period (years)1 |
3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
1 Savings and payback periods in respect of investments in on-site energy generation and efficiency measures made since 2007
CO2 equivalent emissions (kt)
Comments
In 2009, we invested £15 million in energy efficiency
and £10 million in on-site renewable energy technology.
Both these investments have reduced total energy costs
and resulted in annual savings of £10 million.
25% of our store energy is from renewable sources which
has helped us to reduce the risk of exposure to reduced
energy availability and price volatility. This means we are
on track to meet our 2014 target of 40% on-site power
generation.
We reduced carbon emissions by over 3% in 2009 and
are on track to meet the 2014 reduction target of 180
kgCO2e/m2, a 44% reduction against a 2007 baseline.
The EU target for carbon emissions reduction is 20%
by 2020 and we are aiming to maximize our contribution
towards this target.
We are reducing road miles travelled per pallet of stock
by increasing use of shipping and rail which has resulted in
fewer trucks on the road. We are also streamlining transport
from warehouses and have introduced a new logistics
management system to help further improve efficiency.
Minimize waste
Target
- Divert all food waste from landfill by 2014.
- Reduce packaging weight in our products by an average
of 50% by 2014.
- Reduce construction waste to landfill by 50% by 2014.
Performance
|
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 (Projected) |
2014 (Target) |
| Expenditure to reduce all waste (£ million) |
(5) |
(10) |
(20) |
(20) |
(30) |
| Annual savings1 (£ million) |
1 |
5 |
10 |
40 |
100 |
| Average payback period (years) |
5 |
2 |
2 |
0.5 |
0.75 |
1 Savings generated specifically from the investment made since 2007
Waste to Landfill
Comments
In 2009 we diverted over 70% of all food waste from landfill
to either anaerobic digestion or composting, resulting in
savings in Landfill Tax and transportation. We are well on
track to achieve our 2014 target of zero food waste to landfill.
We conducted trials with all top tier suppliers in 2009
on 50% of our top selling product lines to reduce packaging.
For all products we successfully reduced packaging
by 10%. This reduced cost of goods sold by up to 15%
in some categories which covered our investment in the trial
and enabled any further savings to be passed onto our
customers.
We have signed up to the Waste & Resources Action
Programme (WRAP) voluntary agreement on halving
construction waste to landfill by 2014. We are seeking
to implement this policy in developing markets by working
with suppliers to develop recycling capacity.
In 2009 by reducing food, packaging and construction
waste we realized savings of £10 million, which means we
are on track to achieve our 2014 targets.
3.Securing a sustainable supply base
Strategy
Our business depends on the quality and availability of goods for our customers. Increasingly we seek to ensure that our purchases promote social and environmental well-being, while simultaneously protecting our supply base from the risks associated with climate change and diminishing natural resources.
Sustainability context
The majority of the business's environmental and social impacts are in our supply chain, which is complex and global in nature. The major impacts include carbon emissions, water use, land use changes and labour standards.
There is now significant awareness of the sustainability impacts that a major company generates as a result of the goods and products it procures. Customers, in particular, are ever more attuned to the sources of the food and products that they buy. It is both our responsibility and in our interest to maximise the positive and minimise the negative impacts of procurement decisions.
At the same time, climate change and water stress threatens our business, making it increasingly challenging to source many agricultural products from traditional locations.
Risk and opportunities
This year 30% of our own-brand food and beverage products came from a certified sustainable source, supporting increased market share of 2% in these product categories. We are also using local suppliers in all our markets where there is a notable environmental benefit or customer preference.
Since 2007, we have assessed 300 of our top 1,000 own-brand food and beverage products to ensure that they are insulated as far as possible from the impacts of climate change and water stress. Of the products we have assessed to date, 170 have been identified as 'at risk' and we have already put in mitigation plans for 85 of these.
GRO's supply chains are complex and global in nature and we create social and environmental impacts along all points of these chains. Such issues pose risks to the long term sustainability of our business and we are committed to addressing them in the most responsible way. We also recognise the challenges to security of supply posed by climate change and we are taking action to mitigate these risks in collaboration with our suppliers.
Supplier standards
Target
- Increase the percentage of own-brand food and beverage products that are from certified sustainable sources to 50% by 2014.
Performance
| Own-brand products from certified sustainable sources |
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 (Projected) |
2014 (Target) |
| Value of sales (£ million) |
200 |
300 |
475 |
800 |
1,200 |
| Percentage of total own-brand food and beverage sales (%) |
10 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
50 |
Comments
Through our procurement of goods we contribute millions
of pounds to farmers in low income countries. In order to gain
independent approval of our contribution in these countries,
as favoured by our consumers, we are increasing the volumes
of own-brand products from certified sustainable sources.
Additionally, increasing the proportion of certified sustainable
products in our supply chains mitigates risks, particularly in
security and consistency of supply as well as improving quality.
Customers have shown a sustained interest in purchasing
these products over the economic downturn. They tell us this
differentiates GRO in the market and this has helped us to increase
market share by 2% in these product categories this year.
Target
- Increase the number of local suppliers used in all regions where we operate by 3,000 by 2014, against a 2007 baseline.
Performance
| Own-brand products from local sources |
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 (Projected) |
2014 (Target) |
| Total number of local suppliers |
3,000 |
3,300 |
3,600 |
4,000 |
6,000 |
| Value of sales from local suppliers (£ million) |
100 |
120 |
140 |
180 |
360 |
| Cost of changing to local suppliers (£ million) |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
| Annual savings through reduced shipping and transport costs (£ million) |
5 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
18 |
| Net financial benefit from changing to local suppliers (£ million) |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
Comments
Developing a selection of locally sourced produce is an
important part of our sustainable supply chain strategy.
Customers tell us they are concerned about supporting local
businesses. They have responded extremely well to our
efforts in providing locally sourced produce and this has been
a key contributor to increasing our market share in 2009.
Increasing use of local suppliers for seasonal produce has also
led to cost savings through reduced shipping and transport
costs, which has saved the business £8 million this year.
Assess and mitigate the risks from environmental and social risks to the supply chain
Target
-
By 2014, assess our top 1,000 own-brand product lines and, in collaboration with our suppliers, implement mitigation plans for all those identified as 'at risk'.
Performance
| Environmental and social risk – top 1,000 own-brand product lines |
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 (Projected) |
2014 (Target) |
| No. of product lines assessed for risk (total number) |
100 |
200 |
300 |
500 |
1,000 |
| Sales value of product lines assessed for risk (£ million) |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,100 |
2,500 |
5,000 |
| No. of product lines identified 'at risk (total number) |
50 |
125 |
170 |
- |
- |
| Mitigation plans in place for product lines identified at risk (%) |
40 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
100 |
Comments
In 2009 we assessed environmental and social risks in the
supply chain for a further 100 of our top 1,000 own-brand
product lines, accounting for a further £600 million in sales.
To date, we have identified 170 product lines 'at risk'
and have created mitigation plans for 85 of these.
We will continue to work with our suppliers to complete
the assessment of the remaining 700 product lines, applying
the lessons learnt from our work this year.
4.Supporting our employees and the communities in which we operate
Strategy
We aim to be welcomed in the communities in which we currently operate and into which we seek to expand. We do this by investing in the skills and welfare of our employees and by aligning our community involvement activities with community and employee interests.
Sustainability context
Over 90% of employees in retail outlets come from the communities in which stores are located. Perhaps our most valuable direct social contribution is providing these employees with a safe place to work, where they can acquire skills that equip them throughout their careers and enable them to develop and progress within our company.
These employees become our greatest advocates in the communities where we operate. Thus, promoting the welfare of our employees and serving our communities is fundamental to our reputation and our licence to operate. In recent years, we have also realised the benefit of linking employee engagement activities with community involvement.
Risk and opportunities
We face competition for talent from all our major competitors. In addition, turnover of staff and absenteeism add significant costs to our business - at least £50 million in 2009. Managing these risks requires significant investment in training, over £14 million this year. We are seeing a return on this investment with reduced absenteeism and employee turnover, down to 3.3% and 10.4% from a baseline of 3.5% and 11.0% respectively.
While we contributed directly £13 million globally to community activities, we are getting a significantly greater return to our business through improved employee morale and relations with communities. This has delivered substantial benefits to local communities and resulted in very positive media coverage, equivalent to an estimated '19 million spent on advertising in local and national press.
The success of our business depends on the well-being and job satisfaction of our employees and their motivation to provide the best service to our customers. With over 90% of our retail sales force coming from the community in which the store is based, we see serving the needs of employees and communities as intrinsically linked and are committed to investing in both the wellbeing of our employees and the community we serve.
Employee engagement and morale
Target
- Achieve employee engagement scores of 70% or above.
- Reduce employee turnover to 5% or less per year.
Performance
|
2007 (Baseline) |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 (Projected) |
2014 (Target) |
| Total number of employees (FTE) |
143,541 |
147,800 |
149,780 |
153,700 |
160,000 |
| Gross total wages paid (£ million) |
2,511 |
2,600 |
2,650 |
2,734 |
2,910 |
| Employers total tax paid (£ million) |
206 |
211 |
220 |
235 |
250 |
| Annual employee turnover (%) |
11.0 |
10.7 |
10.4 |
10.0 |
9.2 |
| Employee absenteeism (%) |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.0 |
| Employee absenteeism costs (£ million) |
55 |
53 |
50 |
50 |
45 |
| Investment in training (£ million) |
10 |
12 |
14 |
16 |
24 |
| Employee engagement scores (%) |
56 |
56 |
60 |
63 |
70 |
| Total savings from reduced employee turnover, absenteeism and associated costs (£ million) |
5 |
5 |
12 |
13 |
15 |
Comments
A fundamental aspect of our strategy is to ensure our
employees' well-being. We believe that satisfied employees
will recommend our offering to their neighbours and enhance
our reputation in the communities in which we operate.
We are investing in training that will increase the skills of our
employees. This training not only provides us with more
literate and skilled employees, which enables us to run our
business better, but it has also been shown to make a huge
difference to employee satisfaction and subsequent retention.
We want to be known for the skills that we help people from
our communities to develop. We are using opportunities
to participate in community activities as part of a new retail
skills programme, as well as a means to promote employee
engagement. Our research shows that employees who
feel able to express their values through their workplace give
an additional 2%–3% discretionary effort.
Positive impact on the community
Target
- Be recognized as contributing positively to the communities where we operate.
Performance in 2009
Comments
GRO directly invested £13 million in charitable or community
activities in 2009. We identify community or charitable
activities where our employees, customers and wider
community believe there is the greatest need. We align this
with assessments of where we can achieve the greatest
community impact, along with activities that make clear
commercial sense.
The focus on environment and education is helping to
improve the physical environment in local communities,
reducing traffic and pollution through GRO's Walk to School
initiative and the GRO school bus programme.
We are undertaking work to understand better the impacts
of our community activities and will report on this in next
year's Operating and Financial Review.